Taxes and wealth: compensation for non-lawyer fees is limited to a maximum of 6000 euros. This applies to conflicts within the Netherlands with a licensed asset manager in terms of wealth management or associated contracts. When parties engage in some form of litigation, they implicitly and explicitly submit to the general purpose of the Code of Civil Procedure and the duty of assistance to the Court; This obligation to assist the Court is maintained in cases where certain pieces of work are delegated by the legal representative of a party (in this case to the medical body); This obligation includes the assistance of the Court of Justice in deciding on the adequacy and proportionality of any cost item; The decision in Stringer remains a good law; His attempts to assess the adequacy of the alleged tax had been thwarted by the applicant`s omission/alleged inability to provide a breakdown of the tax; The defendant, who was not involved in a royalty agreement between the plaintiff, his lawyers and the Agency, was entitled to ask reasonable questions about the calculation of the tax; There is no reason to impose AMRO tariffs on parties who are not signatories; It is also not appropriate to measure the adequacy of the levy against other composite charges collected by non-AMRO agencies; It was reasonable to use a medical agency; A reasonable fee for the agency item is $50.00 (possibly plus VAT) – A reasonable fee payable by the Agency to the expert is $150.00 (plus VAT) – There is no reasonable basis for a plaintiff not to provide a breakdown of taxes to a defendant; and » Solicitors must first pass on their client`s obligations under the Civil Procedure Code to medical agencies before validating a service agreement with that agency. This can avoid embarrassment if the agency subsequently refuses to disclose information about how its fees are compiled. «All of these questions were removed later and to a large extent.